Tag Archives: DOJ

Report from the 2023 ABA Antitrust Section Annual Conference – Criminal Updates and Developments

Photo of Kayley SullivanBy Kayley Sullivan on Posted in Antitrust Compliance
In late March, attendees gathered in Washington, D.C., for the ABA Antitrust Law Section’s 71st Annual Spring Meeting, including officials from state, federal and international antitrust enforcement agencies. These enforcers gave updates on new policy initiatives and continued areas of focus that companies should be mindful of in their practices and in evaluating the effectiveness … Continue Reading

DOJ Likely to Scrutinize Personal Device and Corporate Chat Policies of Investigation Targets

Photo of Alyse StachBy Alyse Stach on Posted in DOJ
Through recent motions filed in district court and a policy memo issued last year, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has signaled that it has its sights on instant messages and personal devices as potential sources for uncovering anticompetitive or criminal information. Companies should review their personal device and corporate chat preservation policies and ensure … Continue Reading

DOJ Antitrust Brings First Criminal Monopolization Case in More Than 40 Years

Photo of Carl HittingerPhoto of BakerHostetlerBy Carl Hittinger and BakerHostetler on Posted in Alert
Key Takeaways U.S. v. Nathan Nephi Zito is the first criminal monopolization case in more than 40 years, reversing the Antitrust Division’s practice of pursuing monopolization cases only civilly. The elements enumerated in the Zito plea agreement are the same elements required in a civil case, but prosecutors may encounter obstacles trying to prove these elements beyond a … Continue Reading

DOJ Antitrust Division Not Backing Down on Labor

Photo of BakerHostetlerPhoto of Kayley SullivanBy BakerHostetler and Kayley Sullivan on Posted in DOJ
Despite back-to-back losses in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) first-ever criminal no-poach and wage-fixing cases, the Antitrust Division (the Division) is not backing down from its enforcement focus on labor. In fact, the Division and Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter continue to proudly tout their continued aggressive stance, with Kanter recently stating that the Division … Continue Reading

DOJ’s Kanter: New Merger Guidelines to Address Enforcement’s ‘Disconnect’ with Court Precedent and Market Realities

Photo of Joshua JowdyPhoto of Thomas HoganBy Joshua Jowdy and Thomas Hogan on Posted in Antitrust Litigation
On Sept. 13, Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter delivered remarks[1] at the Georgetown Antitrust Law Symposium, largely focusing on merger control enforcement at the Department of Justice (DOJ) under his leadership. After touting the Antitrust Division’s increased appetite for merger control litigation in the 10 months since his appointment, delivering on a promise that negotiated … Continue Reading

Antitrust Division Announces Newfound Intent to Pursue Monopolization Cases Criminally

Photo of BakerHostetlerBy BakerHostetler on Posted in Antitrust & Politics, Antitrust Compliance, Government Investigations
This week, during a panel discussion at the American Bar Association’s annual National Institute on White Collar Crime, Antitrust Division Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard Powers sent shockwaves through the defense bar with a surprising revelation. Speaking about the Antitrust Division’s plans for vigorous enforcement, he revealed that the Division intends to use its power to … Continue Reading

Franchise No-Poach Agreements: Is Reform on The Horizon?

Photo of Jeffrey MartinoPhoto of Tyson HerroldBy Jeffrey Martino and Tyson Herrold on Posted in DOJ
In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued Joint Guidance for Human Resource Professionals warning that no-poach agreements restricting employee hiring may violate the antitrust laws.[1] That guidance, along with pre-guidance litigation, has established some clear ground rules. Naked no-poach agreements are per se illegal under §1 of the … Continue Reading

Big Day for Big Tech: CEOs Testify in House Antitrust Hearing

Photo of Joshua JowdyPhoto of BakerHostetlerBy Joshua Jowdy and BakerHostetler on Posted in Technology
On Wednesday, July 29, 2020, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Antitrust conducted its sixth hearing into online platforms and market power, welcoming as witnesses the chief executive officers of Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook. The hearing lasted more than five hours and was styled as “Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google.” … Continue Reading

DOJ Takes a Stance on Section 230 Reform that Could Place Additional Burdens on Online Platforms

Photo of Darley MawPhoto of Jeffrey MartinoPhoto of Linda A. GoldsteinPhoto of BakerHostetlerBy Darley Maw, Jeffrey Martino, Linda A. Goldstein and BakerHostetler on Posted in DOJ
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently outlined proposed reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.[1] Section 230 has been in place since the early days of the Internet and protects online platforms from liability for certain third-party posts. It has recently become a point of contention between Big Tech and the … Continue Reading

DOJ Declines to Challenge New Bidding Platform for Commercial Advertisement Producers

Photo of Jeffrey MartinoBy Jeffrey Martino on Posted in Advertising
On April 16, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it would not challenge a proposal by the Association of Independent Commercial Producers (AICP) to operate an online platform for advertisers and advertising agencies to solicit bids from companies that produce commercials for television, the internet and other media platforms. The DOJ stated its position … Continue Reading

Fuel Supply Bid-Rigging Prosecution Highlights Interplay of Whistleblower Statute and Antitrust Division’s Leniency Program

Photo of Sonny A. CarpenterPhoto of Jeffrey MartinoBy Sonny A. Carpenter and Jeffrey Martino on Posted in Big-Rigging
On April 8, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division (Division), the DOJ Civil Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio (collectively, the Government) announced a civil antitrust and False Claims Act (FCA) complaint and concurrent settlement regarding a bid-rigging conspiracy that targeted fuel supply contracts for U.S. military installations … Continue Reading

Combating COVID-19 Through Competitor Collaboration

Photo of Tyson HerroldPhoto of Brady CumminsBy Tyson Herrold and Brady Cummins on Posted in FTC
Join members of the BakerHostetler Antitrust and Competition Team on Monday, April 13, 2020 for a webinar where they will examine criminal and civil antitrust risks and the best practices businesses should follow to protect themselves, including an exploration of the immunities offered by the Defense Production Act, the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act and … Continue Reading

COVID-19 Antitrust Agency Announcements and Procedural Changes

Photo of Brady CumminsBy Brady Cummins on Posted in Antitrust & Politics, FTC
Over the past several weeks, the U.S. antitrust enforcement agencies – the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) – have made several public announcements regarding changes to antitrust investigations and regulatory processes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to changes to filing and meeting processes, … Continue Reading

Executive Order Addresses DOJ’s Fight Against Hoarding Activity

Photo of Rachel Palmer HooperBy Rachel Palmer Hooper on Posted in Antitrust Litigation
On the afternoon of March 23, 2020, United States Attorney General William Barr participated in the Coronavirus Task Force press briefing. Attorney General Barr revealed that, on March 23, President Trump issued an executive order allowing prosecution of hoarding that threatens the supply of necessary medical and health resources.[1] Once specific materials are designated as … Continue Reading

Should Antitrust Laws Tackle Privacy Issues? DOJ and State AGs Continue Google Investigations in Response to Privacy Concerns

Photo of Darley MawBy Darley Maw on Posted in Data Privacy
Months have passed since it was first revealed in July 2019 that the Department of Justice (DOJ), in response to various stakeholders’ concerns, was conducting a review into certain “market-leading online platforms” and whether they engaged in antitrust violations.[1] U.S. Attorney General William Barr reiterated that the government was “taking a closer look at the … Continue Reading

Is Big Chicken Cooked? DOJ Intervenes in Price-Fixing Investigation

Photo of Carl HittingerPhoto of Jeanne-Michele MarianiBy Carl Hittinger and Jeanne-Michele Mariani on Posted in Articles
Pork is the other white meat, beef is what’s for dinner, and chicken is now under investigation by the Department of Justice for possible antitrust violations. Looks like the DOJ is back in the criminal cartel investigation business. In June, the DOJ intervened in a class action antitrust lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court … Continue Reading

The FTC Is Looking You Up and Down(stream): Insights From the Acting Director of the Bureau of Competition on Antitrust Enforcement for Vertical Mergers

Photo of Bill DeVinneyBy Bill DeVinney on Posted in FTC, Merger
Since Assistant Attorney General Delrahim’s inaugural remarks on vertical mergers (covered here), the business press has been atwitter about the antitrust enforcement agencies’ views of those mergers. Bruce Hoffman, the acting director of the Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Competition, recently delivered a speech explaining that the FTC will continue to review vertical mergers as … Continue Reading

New Antitrust Division Chief Prioritizes Regulation of Standard Setting Organizations

Photo of Carl HittingerPhoto of Tyson HerroldBy Carl Hittinger and Tyson Herrold on Posted in Articles, Patents
As we discussed in our May 2017 article, the current head of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, brings considerable intellectual property experience to the division. Delrahim started his legal career at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative as deputy director for intellectual property rights. He later served on the Intellectual Property Task Force … Continue Reading

The Trump DOJ’s View on Merger Enforcement and Remedies Explained

Photo of Danyll FoixBy Danyll Foix on Posted in Merger Review
President Trump’s head of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, recently explained that the division will cut back on behavioral commitments such as consent orders regulating conduct and will instead rely more on structural changes such as divestitures to remedy merger concerns. This could signal significant changes in how the DOJ resolves concerns … Continue Reading

Presidential Powers and Antitrust Politics: Part Three

Photo of Carl HittingerPhoto of Tyson HerroldBy Carl Hittinger and Tyson Herrold on Posted in Antitrust & Politics, Articles
In July and August, we discussed the president’s role in setting antitrust policy at the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. Specifically, we pointed out that presidents routinely face competing domestic and foreign policy challenges that require a delicate balance and flexible approach to antitrust enforcement. For example, President John F. Kennedy directed the DOJ to … Continue Reading

The ‘Failing Firm’ Defense and How Not to Lose It, Article Explains

Photo of BakerHostetlerBy BakerHostetler on Posted in Articles, Merger, Merger Review
Law360 featured an insightful article today on a recently unsealed court opinion blocking the $367 million merger of rival nuclear waste processing companies. The court blocked the merger, while rejecting the parties’ argument that the deal should be approved because otherwise the acquired firm would collapse and the market would suffer. The merging companies did not … Continue Reading

Trump’s Pick for Department of Justice Antitrust Division Chief

Photo of Carl HittingerPhoto of Tyson HerroldBy Carl Hittinger and Tyson Herrold on Posted in Antitrust & Politics, Articles
Last month we discussed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings. Specifically, we noted the Senate Judiciary Committee’s failure to nail Gorsuch down on key antitrust issues, including issues he handled as an experienced antitrust lawyer and decided as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which we also wrote … Continue Reading
LexBlog